Men control cash. Women learn how to get some money from guys. Some girls get money from guys by marrying them. Other ladies get cash from men by working for them. Some ladies get money from guys by having intercourse with them. It only counts what you’re willing to exchange for cash.
Before you can still make this choice, they must decide how much cash they need and how they plan to “get” it. It is just like trading baseball cards. Each individual has to determine which “playing cards” are most precious to them, for my part or financially. Some “playing cards” have higher trading costs than other cards. Some cards have a sentimental price, requiring anyone to determine their private worth compared to their avenue or market fee. This is why my girlfriends have been capable of “getting” extra money for their “change” than I turned into. The prettier the girl is, the higher her exchange price. Men understand this; ladies recognize this. I was too naive to realize this.
When I was young, older men regularly offered me cash in exchange for intercourse. I was given used to this. When I was younger, however, they might take me to dinner before popping the intercourse question. Now that I am older, they count on me to apprehend my “trading fee” and think I know how to play the game of life in a capitalistic society. They also assume that as a female, I could choose a person to “purchase” me for sexual pleasure rather than my income, the old-style way of getting a job.
The old-fashioned way for a person to trade his frame for cash turned into getting a task. Men would paint hard, produce sincere day paintings for an honest day’s pay, and consider their change profitable. Then, once they have money, they count on them to “buy” a girl to delight them. Some need to be pleased bodily. Others need to be thrilled psychologically. Most choose to be happy bodily, with no strings connected and at low fees. To decide the trade cost, guys calculate how much they make in line with an hour. Then, they deduct normal charges for food, garments, automobiles, and pricey watches.
After everyday expenses are deducted, they decide how much the money stays and how much they can manage to pay for their bodily pleasure. They similarly estimate how much time they need to meet their non-public pleasure to calculate a truthful hourly fee for the girl or ladies they want to be pleased. The more money they make, the more they can afford to pay for a girl. The greater they can pay for a female, the prettier they expect the girl to be.
They want a girl of excessive “trading” value and determine how much they can pay. They need a female of high market cost for you to please themselves or others by displaying their ability to shop for high-market girls. Either way, the person’s ego is satisfied. His ego or self-esteem is strengthened through his ability to enhance his social reputation on society’s ladder of achievement.
The guy wins both manners. The handiest deterrent to pleasant physical or psychological pride is the amount of cash he can find to spend. Once the calculations are completed, most men determine they can find the money for or are inclined to spend approximately 20 dollars for an hour of delight. Hence, they often throw inside the dinner fee because it makes them feel like they pre-paid for the end and, consequently, are a “massive spender.”
The old-fashioned way for a woman to exchange her body for cash turned into marrying kids, cooking meals, maintaining a comfortable residence, and praising her husband both inside and outside the bedroom. The husband and wife shared the duties of daily survival. The guy bore the responsibility for bodily labor and monetary profits.
The spouse supported his efforts by making the home easy and functional to raise awareness of his interest in earning a living. The guy shared the proverbial “crop” with his spouse as payment for her contribution to his earning ability. In different phrases, they “process shared.” It became a group attempt, with every associate contributing toward the bottom line, which they both later benefited from. It becomes a joint assignment.
Contemporary Society
In contemporary society, however, ladies and men do not have comparable attitudes in income advent or earnings sharing. The feminist movement helped propel this change in mindset by convincing guys, the majority of employers and money-keepers, into hiring girls to perform the much less bodily traumatic positions with the aid of placing them in the workplace to carry out the menial tasks associated with clerical duties which include filing, typing, answering telephones or bookkeeping.
Attitudes and Special Interests
Through those diffused attitudinal modifications and approximately 30 years of unique hobby politics, women and men slowly started to regulate those new thoughts. Women went to the workplace to earn their preserve, used to manage to save being pregnant and bought their bodies to the agency in place of their husbands. She now had two masters to serve.
To similarly complicate matters, she made sub-fashionable wages requiring her to keep family members with one man or another or each that allows you to live on. If she had youngsters, she became further obligated to delight multiple guys – whether or not at work or home. Men endured manipulating the money and the girls. For many men, this meant they might control one woman in the office and others at home, thereby imparting double the delight and earnings for the same 24-hour day-by-day cycle.
These identical attitudes are common these days. The only difference is the terminology we use to speak about the info. Money continues to be disguised in the back of love or labor. Nonetheless, Men and women marry, endure children, and combat approximately cash. They have specific perceptions about money. They maintain scores differently. They have distinctive values that can typically be pondered regarding the approaches and means by which they earn and spend cash. These dissimilar attitudes are complicated by the religious beliefs promoted within maximum Christian societies, inflicting confusion and eventual chaos similar to folks trying to find definitive solutions to the meaning of life. The solutions are too frequently contradictory.
Moral Conflict
Whichever answer one chooses to agree with conflicts with different teachings. It conflicts with the teachings of Jesus and the function of females in society. It conflicts with societal definitions of women’s role at home or the workplace or with the husband’s definition of femininity or his spouse’s expectancies. Women are mechanically forced to subject themselves to men via the frame of mind at something price the market determines her price to be. Subsequently, because guys control the cash, they’ll always cost themselves as higher beings compared to girls. It just makes proper economic sense.
Women’s essential moral battle is determining which teachings they believe and which approach to follow to “get” money. Most women are socialized to agree that marrying a person and raising a circle of relatives is the most moral way to earn their preserve. They are taught that motherhood is ethical and a great way for women to steer society by raising precise children who will move forth and unfold the coolest phrase through precise deeds. These beliefs are worthwhile. However, they depend on a man to meet them.
Whichever approach the woman chooses to observe to earn her maintenance, she should constantly reevaluate her domestic or workplace role to preserve or maintain her widespread residing or moral truth. The difficulty arises when she selectsetween paintings and a circle of relatives. Men do now not should choose.
They can have both without wondering about their values after they need to paint late or go out of the city on commercial enterprise. These choices are less complicated for men because guys no longer need to select one over the opposite. Their priorities have already been established for them. Men are socialized to do both and are advocated with the aid of society to accomplish that. It is less difficult for guys to have families than it is for women.
